| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
830
   |
Posted - 2013.02.14 19:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
Sariah Kion wrote:Verfanny wrote:So if I understand well, James fights the carebear who play the sandbox their way who, in turn, fights James for playing the sandbox his way. Is that it? Thats close except one group doesnt want to play on a level playing field. The ganking is fine but most of the tears come from the gankers now days because they have to put in more of an investment than 3 days skill training and throw away cheap ships to gank ships that took months to sit in and fly. Make no mistake, the tears flow from both sides of this argument and the ganker element has been shedding a lot of them lately.
the person who wrote this suffers from a lack of reading comprehension.
@OP: very nice writeup. i wish every EVE player was able and willing to read and understand it.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |
Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
830
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 19:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
Verfanny wrote:So if I understand well, James fights the carebear who play the sandbox their way who, in turn, fights James for playing the sandbox his way. Is that it?
no. james fights for the one popular MMO that is still somewhat of a sandbox to not be overrun by carebears and become a space candyand.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |
Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
832
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 19:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sariah Kion wrote:mynnna wrote:Sariah Kion wrote:Daniel Plain wrote:Verfanny wrote:So if I understand well, James fights the carebear who play the sandbox their way who, in turn, fights James for playing the sandbox his way. Is that it? no. james fights for the one popular MMO that is still somewhat of a sandbox to not be overrun by carebears and become a space candyand. They should get rid of high sec. Then all 70k-100k( thats being generous) of you can run around in a game that would see little to no future development and quickly become a wasteland and forgotten game. The Ultimate irony in all of this is the same folks who champion the growth of the game over the years fail to correlate that growth to the gradual changes to entice a less harsh "lifestyle" in high sec over the years. I wish they would take out all safeguards and rule of law in high sec because this forum would be entertaining reading all of these morons cry as the game dies a quick death. You have no more proof that the growth of the game is exclusively due to highsec players than I do that it's due to nullsec players. Less silly claims, please. CCP produces the population charts. Its pretty clear to everyone but the head in the sand pvpers. Lets get honest. What would happen to this game if High Sec would function like low sec? Ill tell you what would happen, the game would die.
is eve dying again? oh my...
highsec should not function like lowsec. because if it did, it would be lowsec. highsec should function like a starting point for new players to get off their training wheels and not for EVERYONE to stay there indefinitely and suck on glaciers while watching porn.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |
Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
832
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 20:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sariah Kion wrote:Daniel Plain wrote:
highsec should not function like lowsec. because if it did, it would be lowsec. highsec should function like a starting point for new players to get off their training wheels and not for EVERYONE to stay there indefinitely and suck on glaciers while watching porn.
So, in other words, you dont like people playing in the sandbox differently that you. There is a self entitled group in Eve, no doubt about that. Who that group is is very clear.
nice red herring. if any interaction between players other than chat is firewalled by game mechanics, we are not talking about a sandbox game any more. and that is exactly the problem. if you want to mindlessly grind pve content, go play tera (it also has lolis). leave at least this one game to players who value harsh environments more than fancy colors.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |
Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
841
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 23:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
Azrin Stella Oerndotte wrote:I can't believe someone would be so butthurt over no longer being able to kill miners with no risk at all. What the hell.
I believe that the aggression changes promote pvp in highsec, because now people can shoot you more often, you all want others to experience more risk but when you are the ones that get that risk, you scream like children. Entitled children.
You can still pray on newbs that doesn't know aggresion mechanics, you can till can flip (need a buddy for it though). Mining barges has been easy as hell to gank for way too long and unless they sit in a procurer or skiff, they can still be ganked without too much trouble (they don't fit tank, right?).
congratulations, you managed to produce three whole paragraphs that are completely irrelevant to the topic. i strongly encourage you to read the OP and actually try to understand it.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |
| |
|